Luke wasn't obeying the Force when he blew up
the Death Star, he was obeying Ben Kenobi. Kenobi eventually proves to be
somewhat inept at the Force (Anakin n' all) and a liar ("Darth Vader
murdered your father" and/or "Yoda was my Master"). He
wanted Luke to confront Vader and destroy him in a sense, so why wouldn't he
urge Luke to blow up the Death Star?
Hey guys.
I wasnt going to enter this con cause it has nothing to
do with SF, but since its still going and Mike hasnt said anyuthing..
A jedi is allowed to kill only in self defence. There are some jedi who even
supposedly disagree with that and dont even kill.
I beleive Mace Windu is such a character in the new movie. He is supposed to
be a martial artist jedi who doesnt like to use his lightsaber, so ive been
told.
As for luke killing those gaurds in the Prison cell, I beleive he had no
choice, I think they made there "intent" pretty clear when they were about
to react.
As for the flying cycles, Im pretty sure luke had no idea that the scout
trooper was going to crash into a tree. He was trying to
stop him.
If you want a real puzzler try this one. If luke is a good guy and try s to
stick with force, why did the force encourage him to blow up the death star.
A massive device with a population 570,000.
"Use the force luke".
><< No, it was wrong of Luke to attack him while he was "not" defending
>himself.
> Luke thought he could easily take a sucker - punch on the Emperor, that
>was
> dishonorable, if not moraly wrong >>
>
>OK, then, what about when he was chasing down those guys on the flying
>cycles
>that were desperately trying to get away from him? Or when Luke, Han and
>Chewbacca pretended to be storm troopers with a wookie prisoner to free
>Princess Leia and ended up shooting the guards (which must have come as one
>awful surprise to the guards).
>
>
>Please let me know if this thread is becoming obnoxious, it _is_ off topic
>after all,
>
>The Amazing Sorochinski
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/streetfighter
>http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
>
>
>
>
well, alot of things are suppoosd to be fatal in
fighting games, but arent. Tekken II has moves that apparently break your back
and neck, but the character can come out of these moves still kickin. As a
Storyteller, i could not allow a move that causes 40 dice damage. Just too
unfair... and if players can become masters themselves, and they learned or
designed a similar move, end of game. Just like when you give players those
+5/+10 swords in Dungeons and Dragons
hahaha 40 dice damage? Geeeez. Where are the stats for this maneuver? (and I
thought Cartwheel Kick was supposed to be game-umbalancing)
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Pascuttini <rpascuttini@hotmail.com>
To: streetfighter@egroups.com <streetfighter@egroups.com>
Date: Friday, October 01, 1999 8:54 PM
Subject: [streetfighter] Re: Special Maneuvers
>Marcus the only one I can help with really is The raging demon.
>Someone once told me it does 40 dice of damage.
>Beleive it or not that's what it roughly works out to, 40 dice.
>I did a few play test rolls and it came out perfectly.
>
>As for the alpha counter, I woldnt bother. Its like a charactrer having
>deflecting punch as an abort manuever. (Actually you can use that) :)
>
>psycho crusher is in the Secrets of Shadoloo book. I dont have it on me
now.
>
>>From: "Marcus Paulo Silva de Lima" <mpslima@hotmail.com>
>>Reply-To: streetfighter@egroups.com
>>To: streetfighter@egroups.com
>>Subject: [streetfighter] Special Maneuvers
>>Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 14:59:29 PDT
>>
>>What are the stats from this maneuvers: Raging Demon, Alpha(Zero) Counter
>>and Psycho Crusher? Please, help me fast.
>>
>>______________________________________________________
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>KBkids.com
>>The Place for the Best Toys & Games!
>>http://clickhere.egroups.com/click/966
>>
>>
>>eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/streetfighter
>>http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>______________________________________________________
>
>---------------------------------------------------------